I like the publications you produce. Most of them are clear and based on objective research.
However, this article merely proposes a smoking gun, but makes zero attempt at hypothesis, leaving the door wide-open to irrational thought - maybe bordering on encouraging rational thought.
What is your hypothesis? You seem to be reaching here...
I like the publications you produce. Most of them are clear and based on objective research.
However, this article merely proposes a smoking gun, but makes zero attempt at hypothesis, leaving the door wide-open to irrational thought - maybe bordering on encouraging rational thought.
What is your hypothesis? You seem to be reaching here...