Why Are Colleges Encouraging the Return of Radical Students?

America’s universities, once hallowed grounds of intellectual debate and critical thought, now seem more like staging areas for ideological radicalism. As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House on January 20th, the very institutions that witnessed last year’s pro-Hamas and anti-Israel demonstrations are rolling out the welcome mat for returning international students—particularly those from countries tied to extremist Islamic ideologies. Alarmingly, universities are urging these students to return to campus before January 6th, working with NGOs to expedite travel and cover costs. Rather than protecting campuses from the kind of chaos that engulfed them just months ago, these universities are facilitating the return of individuals whose ideologies stand in stark contrast to the values of liberty and security that define this nation. Trump, ever the pragmatist, is determined to keep America and its campuses safe. Yet, the academic elite seems determined to undermine him at every turn.

The current state of affairs recalls the admonitions of Cicero, who warned of internal decay being a greater threat to Rome than foreign invaders. Today, the decay lies not in failing infrastructure but in ideological subversion. Universities, cloaked in the garb of academic freedom, are enabling a resurgence of radicalism by actively urging international students from countries tied to extremist Islamic ideologies to rush back to campus before Trump’s immigration policies can take effect, preferably before January 6th. Many are even collaborating with NGOs to fund and expedite these travel arrangements. In doing so, they’re not just defying common sense but actively endangering the very communities they claim to educate.

This is not conjecture. Institutions like New York University and Cornell have issued urgent memos advising international students—particularly those engaged in politically charged activism—to return before the inauguration. These warnings are framed as protective measures against Trump’s anticipated crackdown on foreign nationals involved in anti-American activities. But let’s not mince words: this is less about protecting students and more about preserving ideological footholds.

Consider this: the same students who led incendiary protests last fall, waving flags of groups like Hamas and chanting slogans against Israel and the United States, are now being expedited back into the country. These are not innocuous political activists. Many openly support organizations that the U.S. government has designated as terrorist groups. Allowing their unchecked return is not an act of benevolence; it’s a dereliction of duty.

The hypocrisy here is staggering. These universities, which preach tolerance and diversity, have little tolerance for dissenting viewpoints. Conservative speakers face protests and cancellations, such as Ben Shapiro’s canceled events at Berkeley or the outcry against Jordan Peterson at Cambridge. Meanwhile, individuals espousing anti-American and antisemitic ideologies are openly celebrated, underscoring the profound inconsistency in their so-called commitment to free expression. Conservative speakers are met with protests and cancellations, yet those who espouse anti-American and antisemitic ideologies are treated as martyrs. Such duplicity isn’t just maddening; it’s dangerous.

The parallels to Trump’s first term are striking. Remember the so-called “Muslim ban” of 2017? Critics called it xenophobic, but the policy’s intent was clear: to protect American citizens from foreign threats. Now, as Trump readies for a second term, his proposals to expand ideological screenings and revoke student visas for individuals engaged in pro-jihadist activities are being met with the same hyperbolic outrage. Yet these measures are rooted in an irrefutable truth: national security must trump political correctness.

What’s most infuriating is the timing. The rush to bring these students back before January 20th reeks of deliberate sabotage, especially as universities coordinate with NGOs to expedite travel logistics and even fund tickets. Such efforts align suspiciously with the timing of last year’s protests, raising concerns that this influx could reignite unrest just as Trump begins his term. It’s as if universities are preparing for a second wave of campus unrest, timed to coincide with Trump’s inauguration. The strategy is transparent: flood campuses with radical voices and reignite the protests that marred last year. Once again, institutions of higher learning reveal their true priorities: protecting their ideological allies at the expense of public safety.

Historically, America has been a beacon for students worldwide. Yet today, this ideal is being undermined as universities prioritize ideological agendas over genuine academic exchange. For instance, facilitating the return of students tied to extremist movements, while marginalizing conservative voices, tarnishes the nation’s legacy as a sanctuary of liberty and intellectual rigor. But that beacon dims when it’s exploited by those who harbor contempt for the nation’s principles. Thomas Jefferson envisioned universities as “temples of liberty.” What would he think of today’s temples, rife with ideological zealots and intellectual cowardice?

Moreover, Trump’s critics fail to grasp the broader implications of their actions. By opposing common-sense measures like ideological screenings, they’re not just undermining his presidency but jeopardizing the safety of every student on campus. The Left’s obsession with opposing Trump has blinded them to the very real threats posed by radicalism. This isn’t about xenophobia or Islamophobia; it’s about ensuring that the next generation of Americans can learn in an environment free from violence and intimidation.

As we approach January 20th, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Universities have a choice: stand with America or stand with those who seek its destruction. Their current trajectory—ushering in individuals linked to extremist ideologies—is not just irresponsible but reprehensible. Trump’s commitment to safeguarding this nation, both within and beyond its borders, should be met with support, not subversion. If America’s campuses are to remain sanctuaries of learning and liberty, they must reject the siren song of radicalism and embrace the principles that made them great. For now, they seem more intent on igniting protests than protecting students. And for that, history will judge them harshly.

If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.