Tempest in the Turbines

Time to End the Wind Power Boondoggle

President Trump has once again dared to say what many are thinking but few are willing to voice: "Windmills are an economic and environmental disaster. I don’t want even one built during my Administration. The thousands of dead and broken ones should be ripped down ASAP. Most expensive energy, only work with massive government subsidies, which we will no longer pay!" Indeed, the reality of wind energy—beneath its polished veneer of green idealism—is riddled with contradictions, inefficiencies, and adverse consequences. Wind power is a boondoggle that drains taxpayer money, harms the environment, and cannot meet America’s energy needs. Wind energy accounted for 52% of total federal energy subsidies while producing only 10% of the nation's electricity.

Wind power’s image as a clean and renewable energy source is deeply misleading. Manufacturing a single wind turbine requires staggering amounts of rare earth metals such as neodymium and dysprosium. For instance, the production of a single turbine can disturb large swaths of land, emit significant greenhouse gases during mining and processing, and cause water contamination in surrounding areas. Extracting these minerals, often in regions with lax environmental oversight, devastates local ecosystems through deforestation, soil erosion, and water contamination. As Billy Bob Thornton’s character in Landman astutely observes, “Do you have any idea how much diesel they burn to mix that much concrete, make the steel, haul it out here, and put it together with a 450-foot crane? In its 20-year lifespan, it won’t offset the carbon footprint of making it.” This grim reality punctures the delusion that wind turbines are inherently “clean.”

The environmental toll doesn’t end there. Wind farms annually kill over a million birds and bats in the United States alone, including protected species such as bald eagles. A 2013 study by the Wildlife Society Bulletin highlighted these figures, raising concerns about the ecological cost of such developments. Offshore wind installations wreak havoc on marine ecosystems, generating disruptive noise pollution and altering habitats essential for fish populations and marine mammals. Furthermore, the disposal of turbine blades—constructed from non-recyclable composite materials—creates mountains of waste that will plague future generations.

Unreliability: The Achilles' Heel of Wind Energy

Wind power’s inherent unreliability makes it a poor foundation for America’s energy future. The wind does not always blow, and when it does, its strength fluctuates. This intermittency necessitates backup power plants—often natural gas or coal—to stabilize the grid during periods of low wind generation, negating much of the environmental benefit.

Grid instability is another serious concern. California, the progressive beacon of renewable energy adoption, has faced rolling blackouts due in part to its overreliance on intermittent energy sources like wind and solar. As Thornton’s character dryly notes, “Even if the whole world decided to go electric tomorrow, we don’t have the transmission lines to get electricity to the cities. It’d take thirty years, starting tomorrow.” These infrastructure deficiencies underscore wind power’s impracticality on a national scale.

The Land and Landscape Costs of Wind Farms

Wind farms devour vast tracts of land, displacing agriculture, wildlife, and other land uses. The visual impact of 400-foot turbines desecrates scenic vistas, turning once-pristine landscapes into industrial wastelands. Local communities often resist these projects, and rightly so. They’re asked to bear the burden of disrupted ecosystems, noise pollution, and declining property values while distant urban elites reap the benefits.

Subsidy Dependency: A Financial Black Hole

Despite the hype, wind power remains heavily dependent on government subsidies to remain economically viable. The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC) and various state-level incentives mask the true cost of wind energy, transferring the financial burden to taxpayers. Without these subsidies, wind energy struggles to compete with cheaper and more reliable energy sources such as natural gas.

Trump’s refusal to perpetuate these subsidies is a welcome shift toward fiscal responsibility. Subsidizing inefficiency is not only a waste of taxpayer dollars but also a hindrance to real innovation in the energy sector.

Next-Generation Nuclear Power: The Superior Alternative

Rather than throwing good money after bad, America should focus on a genuinely transformative energy source: next-generation nuclear power. For example, while wind energy requires 360 times more land per megawatt-hour than nuclear power and emits substantial carbon during its production, nuclear energy operates with near-zero emissions and minimal land use, making it a far more efficient and sustainable solution. Modern reactor designs, including small modular reactors (SMRs), are safer, more efficient, and capable of delivering consistent, carbon-free energy. Unlike wind farms, nuclear plants require minimal land and operate regardless of weather conditions. Investing in nuclear technology would position the United States as a global leader in clean energy while ensuring energy security.

Clean Natural Gas: The Pragmatic Bridge Fuel

In the interim, clean natural gas offers a reliable and relatively low-emission bridge fuel. Natural gas plants are not only cost-effective but also capable of quickly ramping up production to meet demand. This flexibility makes them an ideal complement to a nuclear-powered future. As Trump has consistently emphasized, energy policy should prioritize reliability and affordability over virtue signaling.

Conclusion: A Rational Energy Strategy for America

The allure of wind power lies in its promise of a clean, renewable future. But the reality is far different. Wind energy’s environmental costs, unreliability, and dependence on taxpayer subsidies make it an unworthy cornerstone of America’s energy policy. As Billy Bob Thornton’s character so poignantly put it, “Getting oil out of the ground is the most dangerous job in the world. We don’t do it because we like it. We do it because there’s no other choice.” Likewise, clinging to wind power despite its flaws is a choice driven more by ideology than pragmatism.

America’s energy future must be rooted in common sense and economic realism. By embracing clean natural gas and next-generation nuclear power, we can ensure a sustainable, secure, and prosperous energy landscape for generations to come. Wind turbines may spin in the wind, but America should not let its energy policy do the same.

If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.