On X, Truth Finds a Voice While Legacy Media Crumbles
The once-dominant titans of the corporate media landscape—CNN and MSNBC—are reeling. In a seismic shift fueled by the 2024 election aftermath, these networks’ plummeting ratings illuminate a profound crisis of trust. Independent journalism, thriving on platforms like 𝕏, has captured the hearts and minds of viewers disillusioned by years of spin and selective narratives. Where once these legacy outlets commanded authority, they now find themselves increasingly irrelevant in a media ecosystem reshaped by authenticity, decentralization, and a refusal to toe the corporate line.
Betrayal on Election Night
For years, CNN and MSNBC acted as the self-anointed arbiters of political truth, assuring their audiences that Donald Trump’s political career was consigned to history. Analysts—some gleeful, others sanctimonious—dismissed Trumpism as an aberration doomed to fade. These narratives, fed to viewers as unassailable, collided with reality on November 5, 2024, when Trump decisively reclaimed the presidency.
For many, the betrayal was palpable. CNN’s anchors, fumbling through explanations that seemed more contrived than contrite, epitomized the network’s deeper failure: mistaking ideological wishful thinking for journalistic rigor. MSNBC, no better, oscillated between shock and denial, alienating viewers who had tuned in expecting expertise, not melodrama. According to the latest Nielsen ratings, CNN’s prime-time viewership has cratered by 47% since the election, and MSNBC’s has plunged 52%. Meanwhile, recent studies reveal that over 65% of Americans now get some or all of their news from 𝕏, underscoring its ascent as the epicenter of independent journalism and its growing dominance over legacy media. In fact, 𝕏 is now the most downloaded and used news app in most countries.
The Ascent of Independent Journalism
Amid this collapse, independent journalism has flourished on platforms like 𝕏, where figures such as Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, and Michael Shellenberger offer incisive commentary that’s neither prepackaged nor pandering. But it’s not just veteran journalists shaping the conversation. On 𝕏 independent voices—including accounts like Scott Adams, Catturd, and my own,
—have become critical in filling the vacuum left by the implosion of corporate media.
The metrics are staggering. My conservative content alone garners more than 2.5 billion views annually, a reach rivaling—and in some cases surpassing—the legacy “drive-by” media. This is not merely a case of generating clicks; it’s about reshaping the national conversation. From engaging directly with political figures and elected officials to interacting with business leaders, policymakers, and everyday citizens, independent voices wield a power that legacy media can no longer match.
Platforms like 𝕏, under Elon Musk’s leadership, have transformed into digital agoras where citizen journalists and professionals alike engage directly with audiences. Musk’s commitment to transparency, evidenced by the platform’s refusal to censor controversial yet lawful content, has amplified its appeal. The decentralized nature of 𝕏 allows users to curate news feeds that challenge echo chambers, exposing them to diverse perspectives. By contrast, legacy media’s insistence on a singular narrative has only hastened its decline.
Real World Impact
The reach of independent journalism extends far beyond social media metrics. When
highlights inconsistencies in policy or exposes contradictions in progressive orthodoxy, it’s not merely a viral moment; it sparks meaningful debate among influencers, voters, and policymakers. Figures like Scott Adams use satire and analysis to dissect cultural and political trends, while accounts like Catturd provide irreverent yet sharp critiques that resonate with millions. This dynamic ecosystem thrives on engagement and transparency, qualities sorely lacking in the legacy media’s top-down model.
Consider the coverage of election integrity post-2024. While CNN and MSNBC focused on dismissing dissent as “misinformation,” independent journalists used platforms like 𝕏 to document irregularities, share firsthand accounts, and amplify voices ignored by mainstream outlets. This decentralized reporting played a pivotal role in shaping public perception, highlighting the chasm between legacy narratives and on-the-ground realities.
A Self-Inflicted Decline
Legacy media’s downfall isn’t solely attributable to external competition; much of it is self-inflicted. By casting themselves as crusaders against Trump and his supporters, CNN and MSNBC alienated vast swaths of potential viewers. This transformation from journalism into advocacy was perhaps most evident during the years of breathless “Russiagate” coverage, where sensationalism often trumped substance.
Historically, the press has thrived by cultivating trust—a lesson Cicero might have admonished modern journalists to remember. “The welfare of the people is the highest law,” he wrote, a principle inverted by media elites prioritizing narratives over honesty. The result? Moderates, independents, and even some liberals now question the integrity of outlets once considered bastions of fact.
Moreover, CNN and MSNBC remain tethered to outdated business models. In an era of cord-cutting and streaming, they cling stubbornly to cable television. Younger audiences—increasingly skeptical of gatekeepers—have little patience for the sanctimonious punditry that typifies these networks. Platforms like 𝕏, with their immediacy and interactivity, are far more aligned with contemporary media consumption habits.
The Future Belongs to the Skeptics
CNN and MSNBC’s unraveling is symptomatic of a larger cultural realignment. Americans, weary of scripted narratives, are turning to independent journalism for perspectives unfiltered by corporate agendas. This shift reflects not merely a rejection of legacy media but an embrace of platforms that foster skepticism and critical inquiry.
In many ways, this moment echoes Jefferson’s warning about centralized power. “The liberty of speaking and writing guards our other liberties,” he wrote, a sentiment underscored by the rise of decentralized platforms like 𝕏. Independent journalism doesn’t just challenge narratives; it democratizes the very act of storytelling.
As CNN and MSNBC grapple with existential crises, their decline offers a cautionary tale: credibility, once lost, is rarely regained. The path forward for journalism lies not in clinging to old models but in embracing transparency, authenticity, and respect for viewers’ intelligence. In this emerging paradigm, the skeptics are not the problem—they are the solution.
Conclusion
The ratings don’t lie. CNN and MSNBC, once cultural powerhouses, now resemble relics of a bygone era. Meanwhile, platforms like 𝕏 have ushered in a new age of journalism, one that prizes truth over narrative and dialogue over dogma. As Americans continue to abandon legacy media in favor of independent voices, the message is clear: the future belongs not to the echo chambers of the past but to those willing to engage in the messy, vibrant marketplace of ideas. The Fourth Estate has been decentralized, and the people have taken back the pen.
If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.