How Career Bureaucrats and Democrats Weaponized the IRS
The abuse of bureaucratic power is an old story, but few instances in modern American history are as blatant as the IRS’s targeted suppression of conservative non-profits under the Obama administration. Between 2010 and 2012, IRS officials systematically delayed and obstructed over 450 conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, an effort that conveniently sidelined them from full participation in the electoral process. The implications of this abuse go beyond the direct harm inflicted on those organizations; it set a precedent for the further weaponization of government agencies, culminating in the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) being deployed against President Donald Trump and his political allies.
The targeting began in the early years of Barack Obama’s presidency when grassroots conservative organizations, particularly Tea Party-affiliated groups, began applying for tax-exempt 501(c)(4) status. IRS officials, led by Lois Lerner, devised an informal policy of flagging groups whose names contained politically loaded words such as “Tea Party” or “Patriots.” These groups were subjected to excessive scrutiny, intrusive questionnaires, and endless delays, all under the pretext of ensuring compliance with tax laws. In reality, the goal was to suppress their activities long enough to keep them from influencing elections.
The scheme worked. While liberal-leaning organizations sailed through the application process, conservative groups found themselves entangled in bureaucratic purgatory. Some organizations waited years for approval, while others were forced to provide donor lists, detailed descriptions of their events, and even copies of social media posts. The IRS effectively played gatekeeper, limiting the ability of conservative voices to organize and advocate. The timing was not accidental: the effort reached its peak just in time for the 2012 election, preventing many of these groups from mobilizing opposition to Obama’s re-election campaign.
When the scandal broke in 2013, the Obama administration initially dismissed it as a bureaucratic mishap. The narrative quickly unraveled when it was revealed that Lerner and other high-ranking IRS officials had full knowledge of the targeting, and in some cases, actively encouraged it. Lerner’s infamous attempt to plant a misleading question at a legal conference—hoping to spin the story before it broke—only added to the suspicion that this was a coordinated effort rather than an accidental oversight.
Despite damning evidence, accountability proved elusive. A series of congressional hearings exposed the corruption, but the Justice Department—then under Obama’s control—declined to prosecute anyone involved. Lerner resigned with a full pension, never facing a day of legal consequence. The IRS issued an apology years later, but for the targeted groups, the damage had already been done. Their influence had been stymied at a critical moment, and the lesson for future bureaucratic operatives was clear: partisan use of government agencies was not only possible but could be executed with near-total impunity.
Two major lawsuits eventually forced the IRS to settle. The first, Linchpins of Liberty v. United States, represented 41 conservative groups that received an official apology and a court order barring further ideological discrimination in tax-exempt determinations. The second, NorCal Tea Party Patriots v. IRS, a class-action lawsuit representing 428 organizations, resulted in a $3.5 million settlement. However, given that nearly half of that sum went to attorneys’ fees, the remaining groups received an average payout of only around $17,000—scant compensation for years of disenfranchisement and legal expenses.
The significance of this case extends far beyond the IRS. The episode was a proving ground for the broader weaponization of federal agencies against political opponents. If the IRS could be used to suppress conservative grassroots activism, why not apply the same logic to more direct threats to Democratic power? The lesson was absorbed by the DOJ and the FBI, both of which later played central roles in efforts to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency and his electoral prospects.
Consider the now-discredited Russia collusion narrative, a saga that saw intelligence agencies, the FBI, and even the DOJ itself deploy false allegations and illicit surveillance tactics to hamstring Trump’s administration. The Steele dossier, a piece of opposition research funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, was laundered through the FBI to justify secret FISA warrants against Trump’s associates. The same institutional forces that enabled the IRS’s Tea Party crackdown were repurposed to stage an all-out campaign to delegitimize a sitting president.
The parallels are striking. The IRS scandal was characterized by bureaucrats using their institutional power to selectively enforce the rules against political opponents. The Trump-Russia hoax operated on the same principle, only with greater sophistication. In both cases, the goal was not just to win a political battle but to set a precedent: government agencies could be weaponized against those who challenged the political establishment.
These tactics reached new heights during and after Trump’s presidency. The same FBI that ignored Hillary Clinton’s private email scandal launched multiple investigations into Trump’s business dealings. The same DOJ that turned a blind eye to IRS abuses under Obama took unprecedented legal action against Trump’s allies. Whether through the Mueller investigation, the unprecedented raid on Mar-a-Lago, or the legal harassment of Trump-supporting activists, the pattern is unmistakable.
This isn’t just about history; it’s about the future. The IRS scandal demonstrated that bureaucratic overreach could be deployed for partisan ends without significant consequences. That lesson has been absorbed by an increasingly emboldened administrative state. Today, conservatives must recognize that the struggle is not merely political but institutional. The IRS episode was an early battle in a longer war over the integrity of America’s government institutions. The question remains: will these institutions ever be reined in, or has the bureaucratic state permanently cemented itself as a partisan weapon? The weaponization of the IRS continues to this day, as evidenced by Pete Hegseth receiving a last-minute audit immediately after being named as President Trump's Secretary of Defense. This latest example reinforces the troubling pattern of unelected bureaucrats using their power to target political opponents, ensuring that no dissenting voice remains unpunished.
For those who value free speech, free association, and fair governance, the answer cannot be left to chance. If conservatives fail to challenge these abuses systematically—through aggressive congressional oversight, legal challenges, and structural reforms—the next chapter of government weaponization will only escalate. The IRS scandal was merely the opening act. What follows depends on whether Americans are willing to demand accountability and restore their institutions to serve the people rather than the political elite.
If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.