Elon Musk vs. Rosa DeLauro: Who’s Really in It for the Money?

Have you ever wondered how a member of Congress like Rosa DeLauro, U.S. representative for Connecticut's 3rd congressional district, could amass a net worth of $16,280,000 after 26 years in office? If she had stashed every dollar of her starting salary of $125,100 growing to $174,000 annual salary under her mattress, she’d still be millions shy of that figure. So where did the fortune come from? The answer is as old as Washington itself: influence, connections, and the silent art of leveraging proximity to power.

Rosa recently made headlines by going on the offensive against Elon Musk, accusing him of meddling in Congressional matters to “pad his wallet” and dubbing him the "de facto president." Musk, the wealthiest man in history, likely found this accusation laughable. He doesn’t need Congress to increase his fortune. But perhaps Rosa’s fiery critique was less about Musk and more about projection. After all, her own career is a case study in how political office can transform a modest salary into a sprawling network of wealth—albeit with a little help from family.

Rosa’s fortune has long been intertwined with that of her husband, Stan Greenberg, a middling political consultant whose firms include Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, Greenberg Carville Shrum, and the nonprofit Democracy Corps. These entities are more than just businesses; they are conduits for influence, where clients ranging from multinational corporations to foreign governments have found a convenient way to curry favor with Rosa—by hiring Stan.

Take, for instance, the peculiar arrangement in 2005 when Rahm Emanuel, then-chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, lived rent-free in Rosa and Stan’s D.C. guest house for five years. As Rahm steered vast sums of Democrat polling contracts to Stan’s firms, Rosa’s sphere of influence expanded exponentially. Greenberg’s clients included household names like British Petroleum, Microsoft, and Monsanto—companies that would certainly benefit from a friendly ear in Congress. Coincidence? Hardly. It’s a system that blends plausible deniability with outright graft.

Emanuel’s eventual role as President Obama’s chief of staff only deepened these networks of influence. Greenberg's partnerships with political operatives like James Carville and Bob Shrum further underscored the interconnected nature of the Democratic Party’s political machinery, where influence peddling becomes an art form perfected over decades.

The real genius lies in the NGO game. Nonprofits like Democracy Corps offer an opaque way to funnel money. Democracy Corps raised millions from Democrat-aligned entities like Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC, Priorities USA, which in turn was staffed by a who’s who of political insiders. Stan’s nonprofit conveniently contracted his own for-profit firms, ensuring a steady flow of cash for himself and Rosa. The money’s destination may have been legal, but the intention—access to Rosa’s powerful positions, including her chairmanship of the House Appropriations Committee—is clear.

And when the time came to pass the torch, Stan 'sold' his business to their daughter, Anna Greenberg, in 2016. The couple’s reported net worth plunged from $16 million to $3.2 million—a clever feat of estate planning that conveniently shielded their wealth from public scrutiny. Meanwhile, the firm still operates, its revenue stream no doubt enriched by Anna’s continued access to her mother’s political orbit - its true value likely exceeding $30 million. One wonders whether clients seeking Anna’s expertise are truly buying her services—or a backstage pass to Rosa.

This isn’t unique to Rosa. It’s a bipartisan problem. Congressional families have perfected the art of using spouses, children, and nonprofits as wealth-generation machines. While lawmakers themselves may not be raking in Wall Street-level salaries, their networks ensure that the money flows indirectly. NGOs, advisory positions, board of director roles, and consultancy firms are the preferred vehicles—vaguely respectable, barely scrutinized, and entirely lucrative.

For comparison, consider the Republican side. Soon to be former Senate Leader Mitch McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, held key roles in the private sector and government. Her family’s shipping business reportedly benefitted from her political connections, illustrating how influence operates across the aisle.

Contrast this with Musk. The billionaire’s fortunes were built not on political favors but on an entrepreneurial empire spanning Tesla, SpaceX, and beyond. Rosa’s jabs at Musk expose a deep irony: she accuses him of profiteering while her own career exemplifies the systemic exploitation of public office for private gain.

As Rosa’s example shows, the real wealth in Washington isn’t in the salary—it’s in the connections. The system is rigged to reward those who know how to game it, using family, nonprofits, and carefully cultivated relationships to transform public service into personal enrichment. And as long as this shadow economy of influence persists, Congress will remain a breeding ground for millionaires cloaked as servants of the people.

If you don't already please follow @amuse on 𝕏 and subscribe to the Deep Dive podcast.